The Chair explained that the report followed previous discussions by the Committee and set out three recommendations, including the establishment of a working group to review the Council’s approach. Members were advised that the proposed working group would involve two meetings: an initial in‑person workshop to examine detailed service models and options, followed by a second meeting to consider conclusions. It was proposed that the same Members attend both sessions to ensure continuity, and that the outcome be reported back to the next meeting of the Committee.

Officers explained that the recommendation for a working group reflected the complexity of rough sleeping provision and the need for Member direction. It was noted that the Council had operated rough sleeping services for a number of years, with grant funding remaining broadly static while demand had increased. Officers advised that rough sleeping services were non‑statutory, but formed an important part of the Council’s wider support offer, and that any night shelter provision would need to be considered alongside existing services such as hostel provision, outreach, and the use of nightly‑let accommodation.

Members were advised that the current delivery model was becoming increasingly difficult to sustain, particularly in terms of staffing pressures, and that there were a range of potential approaches, from street‑based provision to more intensive support models for smaller numbers. Officers emphasised that there were significant financial considerations and trade‑offs, and that Member input was required on the overall direction of services within the available funding envelope. It was also noted that enforcement considerations linked to rough sleeping would need to be explored alongside the Environment Committee at a later stage.

Members made comments including:

• support for the Council taking a compassionate and responsible approach to rough sleeping, notwithstanding that the service was non‑statutory;
• recognition of the pressures faced by officers delivering services within limited resources;
• support for the establishment of a working group to allow detailed consideration of options;
• the importance of a holistic approach, including voluntary and faith‑sector provision; and
• the need to progress the work at pace, given existing contractual arrangements and winter planning.

In response to questions, officers advised that the intention was to bring the outcome of the working group to the July meeting of the Committee, and that early meetings would be required to allow sufficient time for any changes to service delivery, including volunteer training and contractual decisions.

Members expressed interest in volunteering to take part in the working group.

The Chair confirmed that the working group would include Councillors Watson, McDonald, Marchington and Pollard, together with the Chair and Vice‑Chair, and that Councillors Bowen and Neal would also be invited to participate.

The recommendations were proposed by Councillor MacDonald and seconded by Councillor Watson.

Resolved:

(1)  That a working group be established to determine the Council’s approach to rough sleeping services, including whether this should include night shelter provision.

(2)  That delegated authority be given to the Head of Housing and Communities to implement the agreed approach.

(3)  That the Head of Housing and Communities report the outcome of the working group to the next meeting of the Committee.